The Denali Pipeline has some new updates available:
Give a listen to Bud Fackrell's comments to the Alaska World Affairs Council.
Also take a look at the update on the Denali website.
Take aways - The open season schedule looks like it's firming up, and holy smoke! A 5,000 ton module looks ginormous!
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Denali Pipeline Updates
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
5:22 AM
0
comments
Links to this post
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Shale Gas Numbers May Not Add Up?
The interweb is starting to heat up with discussions that shale gas may not re-write the books on North American Gas supply. Here's a few links on the topic:
Shale gas row gets nasty
Art Berman's Blog
Shale Gas: Promises, Promises, Promises
Shale Gas Companies: All Talk, No Walk?
Poll question - Can $8/MMBTU Shale Gas permanently strand Alaska's Gas?
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
7:04 PM
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Shale Gas Alaska Gas Pipeline
Friday, November 6, 2009
AGIA Report
LINK to the State of Alaska Department of Revenue Department of Natural Resource Report Alaska Pipeline Project Report - Licensed under the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) dated 31 October 09.
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
2:11 AM
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: AGIA Alaska Gas Pipeline
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Liquid Fuels - Plan "B"
Tim Bradner of the Alaska Journal Commerce has this story (LINK) about Richard Peterson's, (President of Alaska Natural Gas-to-Liquids Co.) ideas on an Alaska Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) plant.
If lower 48 shale gas really has closed the door on arctic gas transportation projects (I'm not ready to believe that), then we need to get cracking on plan "B".
A GTL plan could include an in state gas line to feed it, and gas feeds to other existing industries (LNG and Ammonia), feeds to power generation and residential heating.
(LINK to March 2008 blog post on GTL)
The shale gas industry is young but it looks like shale gas can't be produced, on average, for less than $4/MMBTU (Henry Hub). I invite Mr. Peterson to present a comparative profitability analysis of a GTL plant in a range of $3/MMBTU to $10/MMBTU.
Bottom Line - Gas Line, LNG, or GTL - You choose, but if you snooze - you lose!
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
4:51 AM
3
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Alaska GTL
Sunday, October 18, 2009
TransCanada Presentations
Here's a handful of Links to TransCanada presentations on the Alaska Gas Pipeline and other topics. I especially liked the shale gas presentation.
Alaska Gas Pipeline
Supply Options for the U.S. Northeast
North American Shale Gas Overview
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
1:42 PM
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: AGIA Alaska Gas Pipeline TransCanada Exxon, Shale Gas
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Propane and Propane Accessories
Will propane wean Alaska off fuel oil? The Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority thinks so. Here's a link to a presentation on the scope of the project and the potential benefits (LINK).
Does it make sense? Sure - especially if displacement of high dollar naptha at GVEA can base load the project while additional users build infrastructure and convert to propane.
It's also makes even more sense at higher oil prices (and by the way the April 2010 crude futures are trading in the $80/bbl range).
It also makes sense to begin adapting local energy markets for natural gas liquids (NGL) that will be produced when the Alaska Gas Pipeline comes on line.
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
5:12 AM
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: ADGDA, Hank Hill, PointTthompson Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline, Propane
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Cook Inlet Syngas
Cook Inlet Region Inc (CIRI) has proposed an Underground coal gasification (UCG) project (LINK to project description).
In a nut shell the process carries air and steam to the coal where the coal is partially oxidized to form syngas. Here's the chemistry (C=Carbon, from the coal, H2O (water / steam), O2 (oxygen), and H2 (Hydrogen):
C + H2O → CO + H2
C + O2 → CO2
CO2 + C → 2CO
The CO (carbon monoxide) and H2 (hydrogen) are gaseous fuels well suited for combustion in a turbine for electric power production. There are some other materials (ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methane and other hydrocarbons) co-produced with the syngas.
Best of all the energy content of the coal can be extracted without the environmental impact of traditional coal mining.
I look forward to hearing more details (capital cost, $/MW, etc). It's always good to hear about innovation and use of stranded energy resources.
Posted by
AK Engineer
at
4:55 PM
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Underground Coal Gasification

